judge Scotillo cannot be trusted.

When Scotillo was telling the x bar president Tatooles, that he was incompetent, why was I not allowed to get another lawyer or represent my self in a criminal trial?

lets add

accessory, obstruction of justice, criminal conspiracy
The Scotillo Power Club

and his bar. I don't think I'm welcome.

It's ok with me. They seem to have a problem with telling the truth, honesty, ethics and cleaning house, the ones I met, that is, but don't forget, I emailed the nwsba governors and others.

Scotillo calls Tatooles incompetent during the day, 4 hours later, in the evening meet the same lawyer at bar function and pals around with Glasgo, Urso, Scotillo's wife, other judges and prosecutors.

My email the NWSBA board of governors, required them to follow a protocol to clean up the corruption. I would bet they followed a adjusted and modified protocol, aimed to please.

Personally, I would prefer going to a AAA meeting 150 feet away, rather than any nwsba/scotillo event. You get less fake, more real people, (maybe a little rougher with tougher problems (what you see is what you get, with a lot less BS)), people, trying to fight one of the deadliest diseases on the planet and if I can help (which I have), I will help.

Obama will be looking for Illinois judge's for federal judgeship............

Scotillo failed 4 out of 7 in this one case as judge


and if we add criminal charges to Scotillo, Chandra, Tatooles, Glasgo, Wenrich and a bunch of others, the list would be longer than you could shake a stick at.

Add hefty fines, the state could make a lot of money on cleaning up their own dirt and get back a little respect from the people and from with in.

A mistrial in a criminal prosecution may prevent retrial under the double jeopardy provision of the Fifth Amendment, If the mistrial results from judicial or prosecutorial misconduct, a retrial will be barred. In United States v. Jorn, 400 U.S. 470, 91 S. Ct. 547, 27 L. Ed. 2d 543 (1971)






Honor or Honour (see spelling differences), (from the Latin word honos, honoris) is the evaluation of a person's trustworthiness and social status based on that individual's espousals and actions. Honour is deemed exactly what determines a person's character: whether or not the person reflects honesty, respect, integrity, or fairness. Accordingly, individuals are assigned worth and stature based on the harmony of their actions, code of honour, and that of the society at large. Honour can be analysed as a relativistic concept, i.e., conflicts between individuals and even cultures arising as a consequence of material circumstance and ambition, rather than fundamental differences in principle. Alternatively, it can be viewed as nativist — that honour is as real to the human condition as love, and likewise derives from the formative personal bonds that establish one's personal dignity and character.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I can prove, that Scotillo cannot be trusted and is a dishonest and corrupt judge.

I sent every one on the board of Northwest suburban bar association, email, few days before the last presidential election. I sent Scotillo, Urso, and every other chief judge in cook county, a letter (regular mail).

I got prof on my email server, and they got it on theirs. It would be likely that some one let Nancy Scotillo know, but who knows. lawyers are maybe the biggest group of worms on the face of the earth.

Do you think any thing has changed............ no, as you and I both see, Scotillo are intertwined through the years closely with the corrupt police departments. attorneys, prosecutors, law bars and other judges.

Scotillo accepts this criminal, corrupt behavior, gets away with it and promotes it.

Scotillo accepts and has no problem with

perjury

false police reports

police miss conduct

coruption

witness tampering

criminal intent

dereliction of duty

racketeering

obstruction of criminal investigation

fraud

collusion

accessory after the fact

embezzling

judicial misconduct

cover up

fabrication of evidence

extortion

malfeasance

police extracting false confessions

aid and abetting

tampering with evidence

judicial co

false reports

lies

shake downs

recklessness

deception

obstruction conspiracy

This is just in my case, one little event in the entire scope of things.

I would bet a person can expand on this and find a host of other disgusting things that this judge is behind and represents in a official capacity.

Maybe Scotillo has a on and off switch / personal vs judge or maybe this is the way he is 24 hours a day.

We can only assume what ever comes from Scotillo must be a lie, and he cannot be trusted.

--------------------------

We know what the feds do, find some one to spill the beans and squeal, deal or no deal.

I just wanted the truth, and Scotillo seems to have a problem with it. No mater how you look at it, Scotillo is a criminal.

I make a citizen arrest, I think jail, fine, loss of job, loss of benefits is in order